Skip to main content

Shadows of a Romanov

Much speculation about President Putin has plagued the media for a few years now. Putin was chosen as Time Magazine’s “Person of the Year” and is often featured on the front page of publications worldwide. While regularly compared to Russia’s great leaders of the last one hundred years, the Russian President has been vilified as the next Stalin by many as they ignore what may in fact be an unfamiliar patriotism: pragmatic and devout. Writers, with tilted heads and curious pens, hypothesize as to his ambitions, hostilities, and credibility; they attempt to solve the strange riddle that is President Putin.

Modern Russia has more than one hundred years of history; consequently, the riddle won’t be solved apart from a historical perspective. Though a Stalinist hue may refract on occasion, Putin’s authoritarian genius has a stride and manner that resembles more closely his personal hero, Peter the Great.

By the end of the 20th century, Russia had crumbled. Her President, the gangster turned patriot Boris Yeltsin, couldn’t help but do wrong in spite of his passionate vision for a strong and proud nation. Through years of drunken cameos and sloppy leadership, he made Russia a jester in the international court.

Putin has a rare solemnity about him, a cast-iron composure with no signs of incapability or personal weakness. If he really were the next Stalin, he certainly could be a ruthless despot. Nonetheless, the shadow that follows him is not one of purges and famine but rather one of order and progress. While Russia is stepping away from Soviet style governance she has not, for the first time since the fall of the Berlin wall, felt obliged to curtsy whenever Western leaders care to dance.

Putin’s demeanor exhibits a remembrance of the nightmare that was Russia for the last one hundred years. It’s as though Putin is taking all the prima facie steps, missed by Tsar Nicholas the last Romanov, which would have stabilized the Russia he lead from the same Kremlin—one hundred years ago—before disorder turned into revolution.

Since his inauguration, he has maintained a high rate of approval for what have been an anything but clumsy two terms as president. In stride with his success, Putin has restrained the trend of his predecessors by avoiding a national incorporation of American-style democracy and freedom. Layered in Putin’s personality are two notable characteristics: patriotic zeal and charmless fortitude. He is deliberate, though enigmatic, and soberly rigid as he maintains a courteous fellowship with other leaders.

It was an obvious time for change when Putin accepted the reigns from Yeltsin and, in December of ’99, a desperately discouraged Russia welcomed her new leader while bidding farewell to an embarrassing, unpopular regime. Putin’s political savoir-faire coupled with personal discipline contrasted with the charlatans who ruled before him. He proved an unexpected success as President.

As such, Putin’s administration has become a signpost of Russia’s history, fettering internal corruption and courting non-western powers consequently fashioning a new image, one of success and respectability.

Labels

Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
Wow, one posts a day of this sort of thing would be rather ambitious. Why the interest in Putin?
January 7, 2008 at 12:54 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dark Horse of the Apocalypse

Here I am, my second blog entry. What I have to say, I am not sure, I have so much to say but nothing to talk about. I watched I Am Legend the other day; in spite of video-game type CGI, the film was pretty decent. I cannot say it was memorable, as far as an apocalyptic film goes, it rose just above mediocre. Children of Men is far more entertaining, deep, and plot driven. If one were to spend two hours, the latter would be better time spent, especially considering the production quality. Speaking of the apocalypse, the presidential race is heating up quickly. Apparently, Mike Huckabee has something to offer as a presidential candidate. I did not know the GOP is so interested in perpetuating the Bush foreign policy that they are willing to support a pseudo-clone of the current commander-in-chief our nation so dearly admires. Ron Paul receives little-to-no attention from the media compared to other candidates but he has the money and grass roots attention (including a priva...
Post a Comment
Read more

Open the Box

Have you ever wanted a website that just did all the work for you. You log in, then with a swivel of the mouse and tap of the keyboard, you get what you want, no searching and squinting and irking. Maybe you didn’t even know such a site could, would, or should exist. It does; at least for music anyway. There is a place so perfect, so simple, so personal, it evokes a pandemonium of inner glee once you understand its ease and simplicity. It is like having greatness before you, wonderfully presented in the glow of your screen; a digital display of online perfection. Looking upon this site, you won’t help but feel moved and cherished; as if someone out there knows you are an individual who has a song or artist or sound that is a part of you, an extension of who you are. That someone goes unhailed and unthanked, bus has left behind what many have stumbled upon : Pandora dot com .
2 comments
Read more

A New Virtue

There is a pseudo-virtue that I cannot help but see as necessary to make it through a successful workday. I don’t know what to call it except a collective mindset . Many tasks at any job can be done by one person but they are often time consuming and messy. If another person steps in the job runs smoother; we know this ad idiom, "two heads are better than one." The ethic is not complicated but it contradicts a very American sentiment, individualism. Where I work, if one person fails to do something, everyone fails. If one person succeeds, likewise, everyone succeeds. Though not commonly perceived, such is life outside of work. Independent of whether the society adapts the collective mindset , any single individual can have one making society a better place. I cannot consider this pseudo-ethic as a sane dictum of governance, I am a libertarian after all; though it would undoubtedly be pleasantly enculturated if each person took it upon him or herself to look after ea...
3 comments
Read more